Seán O'Casey | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Seán O'Casey.

Seán O'Casey | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Seán O'Casey.
This section contains 6,641 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Christopher Innes

SOURCE: “The Essential Continuity of Sean O'Casey,” in Modern Drama, Vol. XXXIII, No. 3, September, 1990, pp. 419-33.

In the essay below, Innes argues that O'Casey's dramaturgical development exhibits a consistent pattern rather than a break in styles, as most critics maintain.

There is a general assumption behind almost all critical approaches to Sean O'Casey's work, which deserves examination, if only because it is so common. Despite Denis Johnston's assertion in 1926, the year of The Plough and the Stars, that O'Casey's first three plays are increasingly poetic in dialogue and expressionistic in form, the Dublin trilogy is almost invariably held up as an example of naturalism. Equally, all his theatrical output from the 1934 production of Within the Gates, whether labelled expressionist or fantasy, is seen as the stylistic antithesis of the early plays. Biographic reference is used to support this: O'Casey's move from Ireland to England after the Plough riots...

(read more)

This section contains 6,641 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Christopher Innes
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Christopher Innes from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.