Samuel R. Delany | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Samuel R. Delany.

Samuel R. Delany | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Samuel R. Delany.
This section contains 887 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Michael A. Morrison

SOURCE: “Samuel Delany's Sophisticated Fables of Identity,” in Washington Post Book World, January 31, 1988, p. 8.

In the following excerpt, Morrison offers positive assessments of The Bridge of Lost Desire and The Motion of Light in Water.

The central literary conceit of the cycle of linked tales that Samuel R. Delany calls “Return to Nevèryon” is explained by his alter-ego K. Leslie Steiner in a preface that appears at the end of the fourth and most recent book in the series, The Bridge of Lost Desire. According to Steiner, “Delany’s stories are, among other things, a set of elaborate and ingenuous deconstructions” of an Ur text called the Culhar, “that ancient, fragmented, and incomplete narrative, with its barbarians, dragons, sunken cities, reeds and memory marks, twin-bladed warrior women, child ruler, one-eyed dreamer and mysterious rubber balls.” That is, the tales of Nevèrÿon are postmodern sword-and-sorcery.

Sword-and-sorcery...

(read more)

This section contains 887 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Michael A. Morrison
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Michael A. Morrison from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.