Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 13 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.

Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 13 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.
This section contains 3,393 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Jennifer L. Martin

SOURCE: Martin, Jennifer L. “Tights vs. Tattoos: Filmic Interpretations of Romeo and Juliet.English Journal 92, no. 1 (September 2002): 41-6.

In the following excerpt, Martin compares Franco Zeffirelli's and Baz Luhrmann's cinematic adaptations of Romeo and Juliet, concentrating on their differing styles, representation of the drama's central characters, and interpretations of its most well-known scenes.

Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann present very different interpretations of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet that imply how these directors see the world and what they value. After reading the primary text, students can sharpen their critical thinking skills by comparing the two films in terms of particular scenes, directorial intention, mis-en-scène, etc., as Shakespeare scholar and film critic H. R. Coursen suggests. The result of this line of thinking is that there is no one “correct” version: “In other words, actors and directors collaborate with the original work” (3).

When students are encouraged to view...

(read more)

This section contains 3,393 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Jennifer L. Martin
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Jennifer L. Martin from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.