Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.

Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.
This section contains 820 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Katherine Duncan-Jones

SOURCE: Duncan-Jones, Katherine. “Grudge Fudged.” Times Literary Supplement no. 5090 (20 October 2000): 19.

In the following review, Duncan-Jones critiques the National Theatre's “Ensemble” production of Romeo and Juliet directed by Tim Supple, noting that the depiction of the two households as racially different had little effect except to generate some confusion and throw an otherwise well-constructed play “off balance.” Additionally, Duncan-Jones praises the efforts of the actors playing the title roles, but comments that Patrick O'Kane's portrayal of Mercutio was weak.

I have always wondered whether a Romeo and Juliet in which the play's “two households” were shown as racially different would gain huge power for a modern British audience. In the National Theatre's “Ensemble” production, directed by Tim Supple, the experiment is tried, though perhaps a little half-heartedly. The Montagues are black, as is the Prince (Victor Power). Some minor performances are effectively defamiliarized, such as the extravagantly physical grief...

(read more)

This section contains 820 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Katherine Duncan-Jones
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Katherine Duncan-Jones from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.