King Lear | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 48 pages of analysis & critique of King Lear.

King Lear | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 48 pages of analysis & critique of King Lear.
This section contains 12,217 words
(approx. 41 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Naomi Conn Liebler

SOURCE: Liebler, Naomi Conn. “The Hobby-Horse Is Forgot: Tradition and Transition.” In Shakespeare's Festive Tragedy: The Ritual Foundations of Genre, pp. 173-223. London: Routledge, 1995.

In the following excerpt, Liebler focuses on the violations of ceremony in King Lear and Macbeth.

In Double Trust: Structures of Civilization in King Lear and Macbeth

It is necessary to recall briefly the Aristotelian definition of tragic action as the violation of specific social bonds:

Now if an enemy does something to an enemy there is nothing piteous. … Nor … when the two are neither friends nor enemies. But … when killing or something else of this sort is either done or about to be done by brother to brother, son to father, mother to son, or son to mother, these the poet ought to seek.

(Else 1967: Poetics 1453b18-23)

For Aristotle, the essence of tragic action was the violation of kinship and thus of...

(read more)

This section contains 12,217 words
(approx. 41 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Naomi Conn Liebler
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Naomi Conn Liebler from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.