A Zed & Two Noughts | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of A Zed & Two Noughts.

A Zed & Two Noughts | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of A Zed & Two Noughts.
This section contains 8,601 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Wills and Alec McHoul

SOURCE: Wills, David and Alec McHoul. “Zoo-logics: Questions of Analysis in a Film by Peter Greenaway.” Textual Practice 5, no. 1 (spring 1991): 8–24.

In the following essay, Wills and McHoul examine how A Zed and Two Noughts functions as an “intellectual exercise,” arguing that the film's more traditional elements—plot, character, themes—come across as contrived.

A

The forms of texts that we might call, for want of a better word, postmodern, are not unfamiliar to us. We can immediately call to mind Joyce, the nouveau roman, so-called metafiction, Pynchon, DeLillo and so on. And we can argue about the applicability of those examples with respect to a category that means little for us anyway. Then we can imagine or invoke forms of analysis that have been applied inter alia to those texts; for example, the Barthesian, the Genettian, the Derridean, etc. They are not mysteries. But such analyses, more and...

(read more)

This section contains 8,601 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Wills and Alec McHoul
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by David Wills and Alec McHoul from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.