Peter Ackroyd | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Peter Ackroyd.

Peter Ackroyd | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Peter Ackroyd.
This section contains 3,640 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by William H. Pritchard

SOURCE: “The Exaggerator,” in The Hudson Review, Vol. XLIV, No. 2, Summer, 1991, pp. 301-08.

In the following review of Dickens, Pritchard finds shortcomings in Ackroyd's “rhetorical habits” and the biography's contribution toward greater understanding of Charles Dickens.

On his second reading tour of America in 1867–68, Dickens met Emerson, and although the sage of Concord was later assured by Dickens’ hosts that the novelist was a man of great cheerfulness and high spirits, Emerson demurred: “You see him quite wrong, evidently, and would persuade me that he is a genial creature, full of sweetness and amenities and superior to his talents, but I fear he is harnessed to them. He is too consummate an artist to have a thread of nature left. He daunts me! I have not the key.” A brilliant observation, and by that time (Dickens was to die within three years) it’s fair to say that...

(read more)

This section contains 3,640 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by William H. Pritchard
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by William H. Pritchard from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.