Pericles | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of Pericles.

Pericles | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of Pericles.
This section contains 5,593 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Gerald J. Schiffhorst

SOURCE: 'The Imagery of Pericles and What It Tells Us," in Ball State University Forum, Vol. VIII, No. 3, Summer, 1967, pp. 61-70.

In the essay below, Schiffhorst surveys the varied imagery of Pericles, offering it as evidence that the play was either entirely written or emended throughout by Shakespeare.

Critical attention to the imagery of Shakespeare's Pericles has been almost negligible, and commentators have often been content to dismiss the play as only in part Shakespeare's. Recent scholarship has indicated that the differences between the first two and the last three acts are due either to two separate reporters involved in the transmission of the text or to the likely possibility that Shakespeare, basing the play on the work of another dramatist, made a few alterations in the first two acts but completely rewrote the last three. Concludes Kenneth Muir: "There are no lines in the first two acts...

(read more)

This section contains 5,593 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Gerald J. Schiffhorst
Copyrights
Gale
Gerald J. Schiffhorst from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.