Paradise Lost | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 50 pages of analysis & critique of Paradise Lost.

Paradise Lost | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 50 pages of analysis & critique of Paradise Lost.
This section contains 12,318 words
(approx. 42 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Joan S. Bennett

SOURCE: Bennett, Joan S. “Satan and King Charles: Milton's Royal Portraits.” In Reviving Liberty: Radical Christian Humanism in Milton's Great Poems, pp. 33-58. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989.

In this essay, Bennett contends that although Paradise Lost is not a true political allegory, a comparison between Milton's prose works on English history and his characterization of Satan reveals a strong connection between the tyranny of Charles I and the false freedom of the fallen angels.

Milton's conception in Paradise Lost of the fall of Lucifer has always been recognized as political in nature. Because of the poet's twenty years' service to the English revolutionary cause, his readers have sought to understand what relation Milton saw between human and demonic revolution and rule. Romantic attempts to link his God with Charles I as monarchs and Satan with Cromwell and Milton as revolutionaries1 are widely considered to have been mistaken...

(read more)

This section contains 12,318 words
(approx. 42 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Joan S. Bennett
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Joan S. Bennett from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.