Oedipus the King | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of Oedipus the King.
Related Topics

Oedipus the King | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of Oedipus the King.
This section contains 4,403 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Philip Wheelwright

SOURCE: “The Guilt of Oedipus,” in Sophocles:“Oedipus Tyrannus,” translated and edited by Luci Berkowitz and Theodore F. Brunner, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1970, pp. 250-59.

In the following essay, originally published in 1954, Wheelwright argues that a key to understanding the meaning of Oedipus Tyrannus is found in its Greek title, which the critic renders as Oedipus the Usurper.

If we compare the best Hellenic studies of the last two or three decades with those of the half-century preceding, three new emphases become apparent: anthropological, psychological, and semantic. The change has been gradual, of course; and it might be objected that anthropology, in particular, is no new arrival, having been a factor in the critical consciousness of western Europe almost since the founding of the Royal Anthropological Institute in the early 1870's. But although that is true, and although scattered anthropological references can be found in the books...

(read more)

This section contains 4,403 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Philip Wheelwright
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Philip Wheelwright from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.