[V. S. Naipaul's essays in] "The Return of Eva Perón"] "meditate" on what he and Joseph Conrad would agree are "half-made societies," composed of those who are "prisoners of their cultures," trapped in "lunacy, despair."… [Naipaul] proves himself to be, incidentally, the best journalist of imperialism to have bothered to write in the English language. He is a kind of portable tree, who removed himself in order to invite lightning; by that brightness, he took notes on his own scars.
The "half-made" society, emotionally, is "parasitic"; it dreams of a "removed civilization," Europe. It apes the master even as it cuts the master's throat. A half-made society, historically, institutionalizes "a process of forgetting"; it substitutes legend and myth for fact and consequences. It consumes "the culture and technology of others." A half-made society sponsors "bad art" in "a country that hasn't really worked" because the redeemers who propose themselves are smuggled fakes; they believe their own publicity, as if they were Michael X or Eva Perón or Mobuto. According to Mr. Naipaul, there is no history in a half-made society, nor any archives: "there are only graffiti and polemics and school lessons."
This is a free excerpt of 191 words. There are 557 words (approx.
2 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our Naipaul, V(idiadhar) S(urajprasad) 1932–: Critical Essay by John Leonard Access Pass.
