Two basic questions … confront us in Lolita. First, is Humbert Humbert "really" a lover and an artist or a pervert and a fool, or is he some curious combination of opposites? Second, what is the thematic focus of the novel as a whole? Critics who attempt to answer such questions, of course, risk provoking Nabokov's wrath. In his afterword to the novel, Nabokov sarcastically dismisses "Teachers of Literature [who] are apt to think up such problems as 'What is the author's purpose?' or still worse 'What is the guy trying to say?'" Nabokov insists that his only purpose in writing a novel is "to get rid of" it…. Nevertheless, the risk seems worth taking, since disagreement about Humbert and the novel's theme has resulted in critical confusion. (p. 67)
[The] best generic description of the novel is, perhaps, a parody of comic form. In parodying the form of both Shakespearean romantic comedy and Meredithian satiric comedy, Nabokov complicates the character of Humbert Humbert and defines the thematic focus of the book. A description of the "parodicomic" intrinsic genre of the novel should help clarify some of the perplexing critical questions.
This is a free excerpt of 190 words. There are 4,788 words (approx.
16 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our Nabokov, Vladimir (Vladimirovich) 1899–1977: Critical Essay by Ronald Wallace Access Pass.
