The greatness of Miller's accomplishment [in A Canticle for Leibowitz] lies not in the mere telling of his marvelous story. After all, television, the movies, and hundreds of science fiction yarns have told the story of Man's folly several times well and many times poorly. And, while A Canticle does have nice touches of humor and irony that the others may lack, the narrative is not significantly above the level of the rest. Rather, the achievement lies in Miller's skillful handling of thought-provoking ideas. While dealing with potentially sensational plot materials (the possible end of the world and all that sort of thing), he has placed most of his emphasis on the moral issues of Man's way—his life and survival.
Miller's narrative continually returns to the conflicts between the scientist's search for truth and the state's power…. It is in this area of thought-provoking concern that Miller excels. The conflict goes on, right to the very end of the novel with some men never stopping in their speculations about the implications of their acts, and with others interested only in the pursuit of abstract, scientific truths. These latter are repeatedly used by the power-seekers in the world of Miller's story. The conflict is age-old but presented in new terms. Students will have no difficulties relating these concerns to the problems they are encountering in their courses dealing with the current post-Oppenheimer period, the period during which there has been so much public consideration of the implications of science.
This is a free excerpt of 247 words. There are 989 words (approx.
3 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our Miller, Walter M(ichael), Jr. 1923–: Critical Essay by Edward Ducharme Access Pass.
