Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 47 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.

Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 47 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.
This section contains 12,842 words
(approx. 43 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Andrew Barnaby and Joan Wry

SOURCE: Barnaby, Andrew, and Joan Wry. “Authorized Versions: Measure for Measure and the Politics of Biblical Translation.” Renaissance Quarterly 51, no. 4 (winter 1998): 1225-54.

In the following essay, Barnaby and Wry trace various biblical allusions used in Measure for Measure, emphasizing that although it is primarily a political play, the work is also a cautionary tale about the danger of using religious rhetoric in a political context.

Despite the common practice of reading Shakespeare's Measure for Measure in relation to the cultural politics of the first year of the Stuart monarchy, politically-oriented criticism has largely neglected the play's connection to the politics of one of King James's most ambitious undertakings: the new biblical translation first announced in January of 1604 at the Hampton Court Conference. While maintaining that the play cannot be reduced to a simple allegory of James's effort to link his new political authority to the “authorizing” power of...

(read more)

This section contains 12,842 words
(approx. 43 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Andrew Barnaby and Joan Wry
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Andrew Barnaby and Joan Wry from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.