Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.

Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.
This section contains 8,202 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Charles Swann

SOURCE: Swann, Charles. “Lucio: Benefactor or Malefactor?” Critical Quarterly 29, no. 1 (Spring 1987): 55-70.

In the following essay, Swann examines the ambivalent ideological function of Lucio at the close of Measure for Measure, particularly in relation to the authoritarian figure of the Duke.

ELBOW
… I do lean upon justice, sir, and do bring in here before your good honour two notorious benefactors. 

(Measure for Measure, II.i. 48-50).

In a recent piece, ‘Transgression and surveillance in Measure for Measure’, Jonathan Dollimore dismissed the blandness of one kind of interpretation of the play adequately represented by J. W. Lever in the preface to his edition of the Arden Shakespeare:

‘Not only are the tensions and discords wrought up to an extreme pitch, threatening the dissolution of all human values, but a corresponding and extraordinary emphasis is laid upon the role of true authority, whose intervention alone supplies the equipoise needed to...

(read more)

This section contains 8,202 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Charles Swann
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Charles Swann from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.