Manfred | Criticism

George Gordon (Noel), Lord Byron
This literature criticism consists of approximately 20 pages of analysis & critique of Manfred.

Manfred | Criticism

George Gordon (Noel), Lord Byron
This literature criticism consists of approximately 20 pages of analysis & critique of Manfred.
This section contains 5,638 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by K. McCormick Luke

SOURCE: Luke, K. McCormick. “Lord Byron's Manfred: A Study of Alienation from Within.” University of Toronto Quarterly 40 (fall 1970): 15-26.

In the following essay, Luke claims that Manfred's guilt stems not from a possibly incestuous relationship with Astarte, but from his failure to prevent her death.

From the time of its publication, critics have ever emphasized the Faustian elements in Byron's Manfred. The emphasis is crucially misleading because by definition the Faustian character deliberately chooses to strike a bargain with evil in exchange for knowledge and power. Byron makes it explicitly clear that Manfred has at no time bargained with evil, that he has gained his knowledge of earthly and occult matters by means of studious and daring endeavour. His quest is self-oblivion, not the self-gratification pursued by the central character in Marlowe's A Tragical History of Dr Faustus, with which Manfred is most often compared. The perversion of...

(read more)

This section contains 5,638 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by K. McCormick Luke
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by K. McCormick Luke from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.