Love's Labor's Lost | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of Love's Labor's Lost.

Love's Labor's Lost | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of Love's Labor's Lost.
This section contains 8,431 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by G. Beiner

SOURCE: “Endgame in Love's Labour's Lost,” in Anglia, Vol. 103, No. 1/2, 1985, pp. 48-70.

In the essay below, Beiner studies the disruption of comic form, and Shakespeare's refusal to provide a comic resolution, in Love's Labour's Lost.

“Not because I was ignorant of the precepts” 

Lope de Vega

Isn't that your mission […] to give life to fantastic characters on the stage?” 

Six Characters in Search of an Author

I

It is a characteristic feature of Shakespearean comedy to foreground artifice: to emphasize the use and creative expansion of literary material, conventions, and devices. However alive the characters may seem to be, however vital the issues which are clarified to the audience through release in the play, however creative and innovative a comedy may be, there is always ample and deliberate emphasis upon the artefact. This is not a mark of apprentice work. There are differences in the relative achievement of...

(read more)

This section contains 8,431 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by G. Beiner
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by G. Beiner from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.