The Great Divorce | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of The Great Divorce.

The Great Divorce | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of The Great Divorce.
This section contains 922 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by W. H. Auden

The pedagogic purpose of "The Great Divorce" is to correct a misunderstanding of a misunderstanding of the Christian doctrine of Hell, to clarify what Dante saw written over the gates of the Inferno: "Justice moved my High Maker: Divine Power made me Wisdom Supreme, and Primal Love." The original misunderstanding was to think of the Law of God in terms of the laws of men, that is, as something He imposes on individuals, with or without their consent, and for breaking which He imposes, without their consent, an eternal penalty. If this were true, it would really imply that there were two Gods, an imminent God the Creator, and a transcendent God the Judge, and against such a dualism liberal theology very properly reacted—Blake's "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell" is one of the great polemics in this reaction. In adopting in its stead a doctrine of...

(read more)

This section contains 922 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by W. H. Auden
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by W. H. Auden from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.