How Late It Was, How Late | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 6 pages of analysis & critique of How Late It Was, How Late.

How Late It Was, How Late | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 6 pages of analysis & critique of How Late It Was, How Late.
This section contains 1,643 words
(approx. 6 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the How Late It Was, How Late

SOURCE: "In Holy Boozers," in The Times Literary Supplement, No. 4748, April 1, 1994, p. 20.

[Mars-Jones is an English critic, editor, and short story writer. In the mixed review below, he offers a thematic and stylistic discussion of How Late It Was, How Late, noting Kelman's political and linguistic focus.]

When Julius Caesar taught himself to read without reading aloud—to safeguard military secrets—it was regarded as a troubling innovation. The general had taken language inside his head and made it private. Since then the scars of separation have long healed, but there persists at the back of some minds a fantasy of reunion: writing returning to the womb of speech.

In James Kelman's fiction, this fantasy of a defiant wholeness has a political agenda superimposed on it, which seems compatible but actually clashes: that of giving a voice to the voiceless, those whom society and literature ignore. Even this...

(read more)

This section contains 1,643 words
(approx. 6 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the How Late It Was, How Late
Copyrights
Gale
How Late It Was, How Late from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.