John Ford (dramatist) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of John Ford (dramatist).

John Ford (dramatist) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of John Ford (dramatist).
This section contains 2,498 words
(approx. 9 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by George Saintsbury

SOURCE: Saintsbury, George. “The Fourth Dramatic Period.” In A History of Elizabethan Literature, pp. 394-427. London: Macmillan, 1902.

In the following essay, Saintsbury contends that while Ford demonstrated some poetic genius in his plays, nevertheless his characters are artificial and his low-comedy scenes are humorless.

John Ford, like Fletcher and Beaumont, but unlike almost all others of his class, was a person not compelled by need to write tragedies,—comedies of any comic merit he could never have written, were they his neck verse at Hairibee. His father was a man of good family and position at Ilsington in Devon. His mother was of the well-known west-country house of the Pophams. He was born two years before the Armada, and three years after Massinger. He has no university record, but was a member of the Middle Temple, and takes at least some pains to assure us that he never...

(read more)

This section contains 2,498 words
(approx. 9 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by George Saintsbury
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by George Saintsbury from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.