Mr. Hentoff's ["In the Country of Ourselves"] focuses on three urban high school activists—Josh, Schwartz and Jane—in course of telling the story of a student uprising that's violently put down by cops. Josh is the head of a Revolutionary High School Collective and bent on major acts of violence—to awaken classmates to the truth that they are in "a state of false consciousness … unfree … channelled into roles in the society that would … make them instruments of everyone else's oppression." Schwartz is briefly a member of the Collective, but rebels at his initiation assignment—to "get into the principal's office, find the senior class records, tear them up, flush them down the toilet"—and is moving toward apoliticality. Jane represents a middle stance: an activist in issues of school governance, she sternly rejects the policies and actions of the Collective, which she sees as an attempt to "play God."
Implicit in the positions and behavior of each student is a question or issue that could quickly open a way to clarification of some major quandries facing politicized teen-agers. Is the culture of slots so rigid and life-despoiling that all energy must be directed toward its destruction? Is a turn toward violence so inevitable among activists as to make commitment an inferior moral option—less worthy than neutrality or apathy? Is the decision to concern yourself primarily with "local issues"—school governance and the like—a copout or a realistic coming-to-terms with the relative powerlessness of adolescence?
This is a free excerpt of 242 words. There are 471 words (approx.
2 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our Hentoff, Nat(han Irving) 1925–: Critical Essay by Benjamin Demott Access Pass.
