King Henry IV, Part I | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of King Henry IV, Part I.

King Henry IV, Part I | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of King Henry IV, Part I.
This section contains 6,559 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Charles R. Forker

SOURCE: Forker, Charles R. “The Idea of Time in Shakespeare's Second Historical Tetralogy.” Upstart Crow 5 (fall 1984): 20-34.

In the following essay, Forker examines how Henry IV, Parts 1 and 2 and the remaining plays of Shakespeare's second historical tetralogy promote a cyclical, providential, ironic, and tragicomic view of time's progress.

For the Methode of a Poet historical is not such, as of an Historiographer. For an Historiographer discourseth of affayres orderly as they were donne, accounting as well the times as the actions, but a Poet thrusteth into the middest, euen where it most concerneth him, and there recoursing to the thinges forepaste, and diuining of thinges to come, maketh a pleasing Analysis of all.

—Edmund Spenser's letter to Sir Walter Raleigh, prefixed to The Faerie Queene

I

That eight of the ten Shakespearean histories are arranged into tetralogies—two sequences of four plays each—suggests an important point about...

(read more)

This section contains 6,559 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Charles R. Forker
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Charles R. Forker from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.