The "best" science fiction writer for most [readers] is a composite entity: Heinleinasimovclarke—usually in that order…. Omitting the enthusiastic burblers who can neither see, hear, nor speak evil of Heinlein, most critics have managed a certain consensus—they like his writing, but the sins of commission and omission in his writing are staggering: poor use of language, weak and inadequate plotting, poor storytelling techniques, and incapacity to handle mature sexual themes being the worst offenders. Yet people, even his severest critics, like his writing, and he sells well. Most importantly, he is capable of attracting readers with a wide age differential and with widely disparate educational backgrounds.
The most common criticism of Heinlein is based on his (supposed) political ideology, and much of the political philosophy expressed by some of his characters does set the teeth on edge; but Liberal knee-jerk reflex has no more place in a mature consideration of his work than Conservative knee-jerk adulation does. Ideological considerations aside, Heinlein appeals to and is criticized by a wide variety of "-ists," "-ats," "-ites"; and there is little consensus on what is his best work. (p. 222)
This is a free excerpt of 186 words. There are 2,859 words (approx.
10 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our Heinlein, Robert 1907–: Critical Essay by Ivor A. Rogers Access Pass.
