Every Man in His Humour | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of Every Man in His Humour.

Every Man in His Humour | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of Every Man in His Humour.
This section contains 5,246 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by James A. Riddell

SOURCE: Riddell, James A. “Jonson and Stansby and the Revisions of Every Man in His Humour.Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 9 (1997): 81-91.

In this essay, Riddell investigates the printing history of the 1616 Folio revision of Every Man in His Humour, focusing on the reasons for the extensive cuts made to that version of the play.

The first play in the Jonson Folio of 1616, Every Man in His Humour, was not the first one printed. Indeed, the largest portion of it, everything after act 1, scene 3, line 104,1 was not printed until all of the other plays were through the press and the printer was at work on the next section of the volume, Epigrammes.2 That is to say, William Stansby set aside six full quires, A through F, to accommodate Every Man In and started his work at the beginning of quire G with Every Man out of His...

(read more)

This section contains 5,246 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by James A. Riddell
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by James A. Riddell from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.