Eliot's theory of poetry falls neither into didacticism nor into the opposite heresies of imagism and echolalia. The real 'purity' of poetry—to speak in terms at once paradoxical and generic—is to be constantly and richly impure: neither philosophy, nor psychology, nor imagery, nor music alone but a significant compounding of them all.
Orthodoxy is always more difficult to state than heresy, which is the development of an isolated 'truth'; but Eliot excels at copious illustration and analysis of illustration; and his conception of poetic orthodoxy and the hierarchy of poets which he has arranged according to it may be said to have supplanted Arnold's. (pp. 160-61)
This is a free excerpt of 105 words. There are 2,963 words (approx.
10 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our Eliot, T(homas) S(tearns) 1888–1965: Critical Essay by Austin Warren Access Pass.
