Forgot your password?  

Kenzaburo Oe Critical Essay | Nobel Prize in Literature

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Kenzaburo Oe.
This section contains 10,760 words
(approx. 36 pages at 300 words per page)
Purchase our Nobel Prize in Literature - Nobel Prize in Literature

Critical Essay by Michiko N. Wilson

SOURCE: "Ōe's Obsessive Metaphor, Mori, the Idiot Son: Toward the Imagination of Satire, Regeneration, and Grotesque Realism," in The Journal of Japanese Studies, Vol. 7, No. 1, Winter, 1981, pp. 23-52.

[Wilson is a critic and educator specializing in Japanese and comparative literature. In the following essay, she analyzes Ōe's variations on his most recurrent themes in five of his works and elucidates its relation to the genres of satire and "grotesque realism" as defined by structuralist theory.]

Ōe Kenzaburo (1935–) is regarded in Japan and the United States as a leading postwar novelist. Deeply involved in contemporary issues, he makes a clean break from the literary traditions that nurtured such writers as the Nobel Prize winner Kawabata Yasunari (1899–1972), Shiga Naoya (1883–1972), and Mishima Yukio (1925–1970).

What is most innovative about Ōe's works is that he cultivates the techniques of Cervantes and Rabelais and follows in their footsteps. From...
(read more)

This section contains 10,760 words
(approx. 36 pages at 300 words per page)
Purchase our Nobel Prize in Literature - Nobel Prize in Literature
Copyrights
Nobel Prize in Literature - Nobel Prize in Literature from Literature Criticism Series. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.
Follow Us on Facebook
Homework Help