[Here is] what strikes me in Simone de Beauvoir, what makes her worth reading and thinking about time after time. Her conflicts are central—for women, for men, for our age—personally as well as politically. Throughout her books there is a tension between being alone, solitary, an individual, and being a part of a friendship, a love, a political group, the world. The issue here is one's ultimate aloneness, but also one's inability as a human being to do anything that is not a social act…. There is an essential ambiguity, which we all share, between our real freedom to remake our world, with the responsibility that this implies, and the constraints which at all moments impinge against us. De Beauvoir felt both sides of this ambiguity sharply. She talked about transcendence, acting on one's continually increasing liberties, or its obverse, oppression; or, in psychological terms, about authenticity and bad faith. And there is the strange, contradictory quality of our human condition: our being part of nature, but no longer natural. Here de Beauvoir was most uncomfortable: her mind keen, her will strong, I think she would have wrenched herself from nature if that were possible. (p. 5)
The question of the relationship between de Beauvoir's ideas and those of Jean-Paul Sartre has haunted me throughout [my studies]…. [A] recent book on de Beauvoir … concludes with the solitary praise that she ought to be considered on her own, rather than as a mere appendage to Sartre. Imagine a book on Sartre whose sole point was that he shouldn't be thought of as merely de Beauvoir's boyfriend. (p. 6)
This is a free excerpt of 267 words. There are 3,034 words (approx.
10 pages at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our De Beauvoir, Simone 1908–: Critical Essay by Carol Ascher Access Pass.
