Brief Interviews with Hideous Men | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men.

Brief Interviews with Hideous Men | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men.
This section contains 6,056 words
(approx. 21 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by A. O. Scott

SOURCE: Scott, A. O. “The Panic of Influence.” The New York Review of Books 47, no. 2 (10 February 2000): 39-43.

In the following review, Scott explores the defining characteristics of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men and discusses its relationship with his earlier novel Infinite Jest.

1.

David Foster Wallace's most recent book presents itself as a collection of stories, but you don't have to read very far to discover that conventional notions of “story” don't exactly apply. The first piece is called “A Radically Condensed History of Postindustrial Life,” and it consists, in its entirety, of the following two paragraphs:

When they were introduced, he made a witticism, hoping to be liked. She laughed extremely hard, hoping to be liked. Then each drove home alone, staring straight ahead, with the very same twist to their faces.

The man who'd introduced them didn't much like either of them, though he acted as if...

(read more)

This section contains 6,056 words
(approx. 21 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by A. O. Scott
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by A. O. Scott from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.