Cymbeline | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of Cymbeline.

Cymbeline | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of Cymbeline.
This section contains 3,328 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Frank Kermode

SOURCE: Kermode, Frank. “Cymbeline.” In William Shakespeare: The Final Plays, pp. 19-29. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1963.

In the following excerpt, Kermode calls Cymbeline one of Shakespeare's most oblique works but nonetheless finds it to be a “superb play.” Kermode also considers the play's sources, language, plot, characterization, and themes.

Heminge and Condell placed Cymbeline with the tragedies. Perhaps the printing was held up by copyright difficulties; perhaps they were puzzled as to the category of so strange a play, by the unprecedented mixture of ancient Britain and modern Italy, comedy and tragedy, history and romance. Dr. Johnson was severe upon these inconsistencies:

This play has many just sentiments, some natural dialogue, and some pleasing scenes, but they are obtained at the expense of much incongruity. To remark the folly of the fiction, the absurdity of the conduct, the confusion of names, and manners of different times, and the...

(read more)

This section contains 3,328 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Frank Kermode
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Frank Kermode from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.