The Lost World | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of The Lost World.

The Lost World | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of The Lost World.
This section contains 356 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Publishers Weekly

SOURCE: A review of The Lost World, in Publishers Weekly, Vol. 242, No. 34, August 21, 1995, p. 48.

In the following review of The Lost World, the critic applauds Crichton's grasp of science but faults the characterizations and the originality of the story.

One fact about [The Lost World, which is the] sequel to Jurassic Park stands out above all: it follows a book that, with spinoffs, including the movie, proved to be the most profitable literary venture ever. So where does the author of a near billion-dollar novel sit? Squarely on the shoulders of his own past work—and Arthur Conan Doyle's. Crichton has borrowed from Conan Doyle before—Rising Sun was Holmes and Watson in Japan—but never so brazenly. The title itself here, the same as that of Conan Doyle's yarn about an equatorial plateau rife with dinos, acknowledges the debt. More enervating are Crichton's self-borrowings: the plot line...

(read more)

This section contains 356 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Publishers Weekly
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Publishers Weekly from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.