The material [of Castle Conquer] is rich and interesting: a feudal Ireland for a background; a plot of political conspiracy and peasant revolt; a love tale; Irish tenant farmers, peddlers, soldiers, landowners; Irish songs, frolics, dancing, fairs. The prose is fresh and easy-flowing. And a music comes into it by way of lovely Irish names and the peculiar Irish-English dialog. Nor, given the peasant rhythm, can one seriously object to the book's slow movement, or to the somewhat episodic way in which it unfolds. What, then, is wrong? This: for some reason, perhaps because Mr. Colum has placed too much reliance upon his content, upon its inherent soil-ness and lyricism, upon the general interest in Ireland's struggle for political autonomy, because he has given himself too sparingly unto his work, the poetry of the material and the poetry of the prose fail to achieve a mutually transforming contact. There is no sustained interchange between them. There is no complete intersaturation…. Hence Castle Conquer, for all its fresh loveliness and health, misses that living beauty which one somehow expects from it.
A review of "Castle Conquer," in Broom, Vol. 5, No. 1, August, 1923, p. 53.
This is a free excerpt of 195 words. There are 198 words (approx.
1 page at 300 words per page) in the full critical essay.
Read the rest of this Criticism with our Colum, Padraic 1881–1972: Critical Essay by Broom Access Pass.
