C. K. Williams | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of C. K. Williams.

C. K. Williams | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of C. K. Williams.
This section contains 692 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by David Lehman

SOURCE: “The Prosaic Principle,” in Partisan Review, Vol. LII, No. 3, Summer, 1985, pp. 302–08.

In the following excerpt, Lehman comments on the prose quality of contemporary poetry and offers a tempered assessment of Tar. According to Lehman, Williams's long lines are often well-suited to the poet's subject, but occasionally come off as “plodding” and needlessly elaborate.

Marianne Moore recommended that we read poetry “with a perfect contempt for it.” Sensible advice, especially these days when, from the swelling ranks of MFA poetry programs, every Tom, Dick, and Harry—not to mention Jane, Judy, and Janice—seems to have a volume in the offing. To these competitors for our attention, we would be wise to offer strenuous resistance, at least initially, and as much in self-defense as in the earnest desire to distinguish the genuine from the spurious article. Perhaps no period before ours has set such great store by originality...

(read more)

This section contains 692 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by David Lehman
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by David Lehman from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.