Dancing at Lughnasa | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Dancing at Lughnasa.

Dancing at Lughnasa | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Dancing at Lughnasa.
This section contains 611 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by William A. Henry III

SOURCE: "Potent Memories, Great Joys," in Time, Vol. 138, No. 18, 4 November 1991, p. 97.

In the review below, Henry claims that Dancing at Lughnasa evokes great joy as well as sadness, and states that although Friel has been influenced by Chekhov, this work is one of "authentic originality. "

A good dramatist defines a theme, shapes a story to illu-mine it and moves clearly and logically toward an emotionally satisfying conclusion. A great dramatist can make quicksilver leaps from theme to theme, fragment a story into seemingly disparate shards and play games with character and chronology, yet achieve a conclusion that is even more emotionally satisfying because of the sense of surprise and revelation in how it all comes together. For more than three decades, in such works as Aristocrats and Philadelphia, Here I Come!, Ireland's Brian Friel has been a good dramatist. In Dancing at Lughnasa, which opened on Broadway last...

(read more)

This section contains 611 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by William A. Henry III
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by William A. Henry III from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.