Aucassin and Nicolette | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Aucassin and Nicolette.

Aucassin and Nicolette | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Aucassin and Nicolette.
This section contains 10,178 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Anne Elizabeth Cobby

SOURCE: “Aucassin et Nicolette,” in Ambivalent Conventions: Formula and Parody in Old French, Rodopi, 1995, pp. 55-81.

In the following essay, Cobby argues that analyzing the manner in which the author manipulates his readers' expectations reveals the essentially parodic nature of Aucassin et Nicolette.

Much has been written on Aucassin et Nicolette in the last hundred years, but alone among our texts it is at present not a very active field.1 Work on parody in the text was surveyed thoroughly and critically by Tony Hunt in 1979, in an article which argues against its being a parodic work and calls attention most usefully to the dangers which beset parody scholarship in general; a more recent but brief survey is by Imre Szabics.2 The presence of parody is now taken for granted by most critics, though the extent and significance attributed to it vary: from ‘allusion pleine d’humour’ to a...

(read more)

This section contains 10,178 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Anne Elizabeth Cobby
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Anne Elizabeth Cobby from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.