Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.

Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.
This section contains 825 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Alastair Macaulay

SOURCE: Macaulay, Alastair. “A Stunning Queen, But Where Is the Chemistry?” Financial Times (25 April 2002): 18.

In the following excerpt, Macaulay reviews Michael Attenborough's 2002 Royal Shakespeare Company production of Antony and Cleopatra. The critic has high praise for Sinead Cusack's representation of Cleopatra, noting the freshness of her delivery, her devotion to the language of the play, and the variations in her tone and demeanor.

Sinead Cusack is surely the most beautiful woman I've seen playing Shakespeare's Cleopatra, and her speaking of the lines—though here the competition is yet stiffer—may well be the most beautiful I've heard. In truth, I can't quite believe in her as the Egyptian queen—in voice and looks she is, even with dark wig and glamorous raiment, so very Celtic—but she's so intelligent and skilful an actress that it's impressive how often I suspend disbelief. Shakespeare, indeed the Royal Shakespeare Company, used...

(read more)

This section contains 825 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Alastair Macaulay
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Alastair Macaulay from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.