Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.

Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.
This section contains 1,168 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Russell Jackson

SOURCE: Jackson, Russell. “Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon: Summer and Winter, 1999-2000.” Shakespeare Quarterly 51, no. 2 (summer 2000): 217-29.

In the following excerpted review, Jackson comments on the Royal Shakespeare Company's production of Antony and Cleopatra at Stratford-upon-Avon, directed by Steven Pimlott. In particular, Jackson finds Frances de la Tour's performance of Cleopatra outstanding, and notes that Alan Bates's Antony, while amiable, is somewhat unheroic.

In my previous report on Shakespeare at Stratford-upon-Avon I wondered more in sorrow than in anger what kind of artistic policy the RSC might lay claim to.1 Whether or not in the course of the “Summer Festival Season” the company found a policy, they certainly acquired a stage, which may amount to the same thing. The 1500-seat proscenium-arch main house, with whose architecture directors and designers have struggled since it opened in 1932, was remodeled under the direction of the company's resident designer, Anthony Rowe. For the summer...

(read more)

This section contains 1,168 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Russell Jackson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Russell Jackson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.