A Midsummer Night's Dream | Jay L. Halio

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.
This section contains 5,120 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Jay L. Halio

Jay L. Halio

SOURCE: "Nightingales That Roar: The Language of A Midsummer Night's Dream," in Traditions and Innovations: Essays on British Literature of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, edited by David G. Allen and Robert A. White, University of Delaware Press, 1990, pp. 137-49.

In the following essay, Halio maintains that the language of the play, in its darkness, complexity, and in the contradictions it contains suggests that, contrary to the apparently happy ending, "benevolent providence does not always or inevitably enter into human affairs to make things right."

In an essay called "On the Value of Hamlet," Stephen Booth has shown how that play simultaneously frustrates and fulfills audience expectations and otherwise presents contradictions that belie or bedevil the attempts of many a reductionist critic to demonstrate a coherent thematic pattern in Shakespeare's masterpiece. Booth's commentary is particularly directed to the language and action of act...

(read more)

This section contains 5,120 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Jay L. Halio
Follow Us on Facebook