A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 47 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.

A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 47 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.
This section contains 12,189 words
(approx. 41 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Tom Clayton

SOURCE: Clayton, Tom. “‘So quick bright things come to confusion’: or, What Else was A Midsummer Night's Dream About?”1 In Shakespeare: Text and Theater, edited by Lois Potter and Arthur F. Kinney, pp. 62-91. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1999.

In the following essay, Clayton highlights the brighter, more lighthearted aspects of A Midsummer Night's Dream, emphasizing the civilized and complementary features of the relationship between Theseus and Hippolyta and downplaying the bestial connotation in the relationship between the transformed Bottom and Titania.

In the now ancient history of Shakespeare's birth-quatercentenary year of 1964, it would not have been easy to find in the year's publications a pair of perspectives less alike than those of R. W. Dent,

Rather than being a foe to good living, poetic imagination can be its comfort and its guide, far “more yielding” than most dreams. Whether A Midsummer Night's Dream has an unplumbed “bottom...

(read more)

This section contains 12,189 words
(approx. 41 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Tom Clayton
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Tom Clayton from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.