A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.

A Midsummer Night's Dream | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of A Midsummer Night's Dream.
This section contains 5,102 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by M. E. Comtois

SOURCE: “The Comedy of the Lovers in A Midsummer Night's Dream,” in Essays in Literature, Vol. 12, No. 1, Spring, 1985, pp. 15-25.

In the following essay, Comtois asserts that the lovers' contribution to the play is primarily in the realm of farce.

A predilection of older criticism to view the young lovers in A Midsummer Night's Dream as romantic protagonists1 has given way to a general recognition of their comic function in more contemporary criticism.2 What should follow is the recognition that the play is not primarily about them, that they do not form a main plot, but that they are just one voice in a four part madrigal of the nobility, lovers, artisans and fairies.3 That voice, until the last act, has been so written as to provide at least as much comedy as is provided by the artisans. The lovers' on-going contribution is principally farce, a form which...

(read more)

This section contains 5,102 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by M. E. Comtois
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by M. E. Comtois from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.