Gives a brief overview of major United States Supreme Court cases including Brown v. Board of Education, McCulloch v. Maryland, Miranda v. Arizona, and Roe v. Wade. Analyzes the results of those cases and discusses their lasting effects.

Reviews the U.S. Supreme Court Case Pennsylvania State Police vs. Suders. Provides details of the case. Examines the majority opinion written by Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

Legal arguments on both sides of a hypothetical federal law outlawing private acts of discrimination based upon sexual orientation. The argument is that such a law would be constitutional under the interstate commerce clause.

"An American Insurrection", by William Doyle, illustrates how government officials can lear from the mistakes of their predecessors and even from the mistakes of past Presidents. Two good case studies are President J.F. Kennedy and and Chief U.S. Marshall McShane.

A review of the sexual discrimination case by Ann Hopkins against Price Waterhouse in which Hopkins claimed she was unrightful denied a partnership.

Supreme Court case on Brown vs. the Board of Education. The desegregation of schools in the United States.

Essay discusses the issue of capital punishment.

Essay provides an analysis of the Case of Kevin Wiggins.

This opinion paper, based on a case study, gives reasons why it is not discriminatory to require drivers older than 80 years old to pass a special driving test. The paper cites some of the many reasons that make many elderly people dangerous drivers.

Causes of Crime

A comprehensive analysis of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and how it has affected U.S. society. This act was designed to protect the rights of persons with disabilities.

In 1994, California legislators and voters approved a major change in the state's criminal sentencing law, (commonly known as Three Strikes and You're Out). The law was enacted as Chapter 12, Statutes of 1994 by the Legislature and by the electorate in Proposition 184 (Mullin, 1998). As its name suggests, the law requires, among other things, a minimum sentence of 25 years to life for three-time repeat offenders with multiple prior serious or violent felony convictions.

Burning the flag is a very serious statement, however it seems to be protected by the government. Although it used to be against the law to desecrate the flag, in 1989 a Supreme Court case overturned the law. Texas v. Johnson, in a close 5-4 conclusion, decided flag desecration was to be protected under the 1st Amendment, the freedom of speech, of the press, of association, of assembly, and petition.

Essay examines the tactics and methods of gathering information.

Essay provides a summary of the case Greeley Vs. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors Inc.

Explores the issue of gun control. Provides pros and cons for instituting more gun control laws. Examines the logistics of enforcing such laws.

Essay presents a discussion on high security passports.

While not perfect, the Australian legal system has been generally effective with regard to cases involving women in the workplace. The system allows women to resolves disputes upon apparent sexual discrimination and unfair treatment in the workplace. And the system encourages employers to promote equality within the workplace to all disadvantaged groups, not just women.

A testimony for Louis Riel. Concerning the indictment of Louis Riel, one of the most famous trials in Canadian history.

Evaluates the effectiveness of international law. Debates how its instruments and regimes are generally effective in dealing with international criminal issues that may influence Australian criminal law. Examines the issue of enforceability.

Essay examines if divorce has become too easy, thus weakening families and resulting in social instability.

Dear Dr. King, Throughout your lifetime you lived for, supported, and fought for the fair treatment of African Americans in America. There have been many times throughout the history of the United States when Americans have felt the need to rise up against the government for "unjust" treatment. "Dr. King, like Henry Thoreau, you were willing to suffer for moral and political principles, even when faced with laws denying civil rights to all citizens.

Essay provides a discussion on a law case study.

Discusses the Supreme Court Case Koremastu versus the United States. Explains the issues of the case. Describes how the constitutionality of internment camps.

This essay is the legal briefing of the court case Lawrence v. Texas. It discusses the background of the case and the questions raised before the court by both petitioners and the jury. It also critically analyzes the ruling of the court and considers broader implications, including its effect on other cases.

A case in which the question of whether intentional infliction of emotional distress occur when someone witness a friend's child being injured.

A legal case involving the dissolution of a marriage including child support and custody issues.

An article found on the 16 March 2005 in The Advocate, entitled "Bus owner says new rules discriminatory," raises the issue of discrimination towards smaller companies. The following case study examines the case law that is relevant to this issue. It also determines the overall ability of the legal system to address the issue and what changes can be made to the system in this regard.

On July 15, 1994, the United States sued Microsoft for unlawfully maintaining its monopoly in the market for PC operating system software. The lawsuit alleged that Microsoft engaged in anti-competitive marketing practices directed at PC manufacturers that distributed Microsoft operating system software preinstalled on its PCs. Microsoft began to levy fines against original equipment manufacturing (OEM) companies who distributed or promoted operating systems other than Microsoft. On August 21, 1995, Microsoft "consented" to a "Final Judgement" against them.

Discusses the Supreme Court case of Odgen v Gibbons (1824). Examines the issue of the constitutionality of the decision of the court as well as the ability of the steamboat to influence the politics of the United States during that era.

Determines if a case is a political question using the guidelines presented by the Baker case.

Three primary causes led to the wrongful conviction of David Milgaard in 1969. Pre-existing social perceptions of deviance placed Milgaard among the socially marginalized, making him an easy target for police and public allegations. The broadcast media impacted public awareness and police actions, presenting a problem with jury discrimination and witness testimony. And perhaps most inexcusably, the Canadian criminal justice system committed misconduct in both the investigation and prosecution of the case.

A law quote about Ronald Reagan

Detailed research report about the Rodney King beatiing in 1992 in Los Angeles. Includes direct quotes from witnesses, victim and officers. Pleased be advised, some parts on highly graphic.

A descriptive overview of the Roe vs. Wade case, in which the U.S. Supreme Court overruled a Texas law making abortion a crime, and the consequences of the Supreme Court's decision.

Search and Seizure

Cases where self defense is used as a justification for homocide may or may not be valid due to the ethnicity, geographical area where the trial occurs, social interpretation and an "arrest the winner" mindset of law enforcement officers.

The synthesis of several arguments over the issue "Should english be the offical language?"

Essay discusses the special forces and international affairs.

Summarizes an unfair dismissal in an employment tribunal case. The plaintiff made an allegation that she was constructively dismissed as a breach of contract which led to her resignation. The burden of proof was on the defendant to prove that there was a breach of contract, which led to an unfair dismissal.

Why do teens choose to take drugs? The reasons include social disorganization, peer pressure, factors related to the teen's family, and emotional or rational choice. However, emotional or rational choice is the most significant reason.

Australia is a strong supporter of free speech, human rights, and civil liberties. Recent laws passed in Australia to counter terrorism have caused an uproar in terms of their compromising the public's civil rights and liberties. These laws will continue to meet serious criticism from the public until drastic changes are made.

The history of the Roe v Wade Supreme Court case that led to abortion being constitutionally protected in the United States. Information about the plantiff, her attorneys, the defense attorneys and case, and the decision is included.

This was certainly not Charles Thomas's first time in a court room, several months before this he was being tired on a base offence level for money laundering with his partner Herbert Fletcher. Fletcher was tried in a different trial but was still called as a witness to this trial as a result of him pleading guilty and striking a deal with the court for his full cooperation.