The Miranda warning has become one of the most visible protections of Americans civil rights. Because the warning protects suspected criminals at the point of arrest, the warning has provoked debate about the benefits of protecting individual rights at...

Requirement that police tell a suspect in their custody of his/her constitutional rights before they question him/her, so named as a result of the Miranda v. Arizona ruling establishing such requirements. Law enforcement procedure that forewarns...

Arrest warrant · Search warrant Probable cause · Knock-and-announce Exigent circumstance Reasonable suspicion Search and seizure · Search of persons Arrest  · Detention Right to silence · Miranda warning (U.S.) Grand...

'Miranda warning' in grip of uncertainty Supreme Court ready to answer challenge from Congress By LYLE DENNISTON Baltimore Sun Wednesday, April 19, 2000 Washington -- In 1968, Gerald Ford, then a Republican congressman, made clear to his colleagues that...

Since the United States Supreme Court's 1966 landmark decision in Miranda v. Arizona, law enforcement officers have been required to advise individuals, in custody, of their Constitutional rights under the Fifth (against self-incrimination) and Sixth (right to legal counsel) Amendments prior to questioning or...

A newly released court document details four decades of alleged Chicago mob killings, including the slayings of six men accused of robbing the vault of the Mafia's biggest boss.The 63-page document was submitted by federal prosecutors to U.S. District Judge James B. Zagel. He is...

The Libby conviction, based on journalists' testimony, is forcing the rapidly changing media to re-examine how they can gather news without getting hauled into court.White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby was found guilty Tuesday on four felony counts of lying about his role in...